Join our WhatsApp channel HERE for the latest Benue news and updates!
In the tight-knit online communities of Benue State, Nigeria, a storm is brewing over allegations of mismanaged crowdfunding and hidden identities. John Mark, a local figure who recently underwent a major operation, is publicly calling for an account and refund of monies raised on his behalf, pointing fingers at a mysterious benefactor known only as “Adoo” – real name Terhemba Eugenia Asue. The saga, tied to the broader “Martha Mumun and Adoo” narrative, has sparked heated debates on Facebook, with accusations flying about deception, private aid being passed off as public generosity, and outright conspiracy.
The controversy centers on Adoo Eugenia, described by critics as a shadowy operator who allegedly funnels her personal funds to help vulnerable individuals in private, only to later post publicly claiming others stepped in. According to Orkwarde – a vocal commentator in the thread – most donations for victims on these platforms trace back solely to Adoo, who prefers to conceal her identity. “She uses her money to help someone in private, then post that someone else helped the person,” Orkwarde writes. “Adoo singlehandedly sponsored so many cases here for Benue people on a low.”
John Mark’s case is the latest flashpoint. A fundraising drive reportedly amassed 1.8 million naira for his operation. Adoo is said to have transferred 300,000 naira to him on October 29th, but publicly attributed the donation to an anonymous source. Screenshots of their private inbox chats, however, tell a different story, showing Adoo confirming the transfer herself. Similar patterns emerge in other incidents, including aid for a “Martha Iphone” (likely a reference to a victim needing a phone or related support), where Adoo’s involvement was downplayed or misrepresented.
Defenders of Adoo are quick to push back. One supporter declares, “The Adoo you people conspired to drag is different from who I know. She has 100% good heart to give and help without asking return.” They stand by her fully, acknowledging “imperfections” but dismissing the narratives as “cooked” fabrications. “With the above, I stand by her 100% because I know her,” the post continues, promising to share text messages and voice notes from a “Martha” as further proof. There’s even a quip about Adoo being “mute,” perhaps a jab at her low-profile approach or silence amid the backlash.
Orkwarde isn’t backing down, teasing receipts of donations to John Mark and others to bolster the claims. The post urges transparency: “This is the problem with Terhemba Eugenia Asue and she need to stop it.” It’s a call to action in a space where crowdfunding has become a lifeline for many in Benue, but trust is fragile.
This isn’t just about one donation gone awry – it’s a microcosm of broader issues in online philanthropy. In regions like Benue, where economic hardships amplify the need for community support, platforms like Facebook have turned into virtual town squares for aid. Yet, anonymity breeds suspicion. Donors want credit, recipients demand accountability, and middlemen (or women) like Adoo risk being vilified for either too much humility or perceived manipulation.
John Mark’s demand for a refund and full accounting could set a precedent. If proven, the discrepancies in chats versus public posts might erode confidence in similar drives. On the flip side, if Adoo’s supporters substantiate her selfless intent, it could highlight how good deeds get twisted in the court of public opinion.
As the thread promises more evidence – receipts, messages, voice notes – the Benue online community watches closely. Will this lead to refunds, apologies, or just more drama? In the world of internet altruism, one thing’s clear: transparency isn’t optional when lives and livelihoods are on the line. Stay tuned; the next post might drop the mic.
