Fact-Check Debunks Asom Jerry’s Explosive Claims Against Governor Alia

A viral Facebook post accusing Governor Fr. Hyacinth Iormem Alia of “scamming” lawyers who defended 23 Local Government Chairmen and 276 Councillors during election tribunal cases has been thoroughly dismantled in a detailed rebuttal posted on November 11, 2025. The original allegation by Mr. Asom D Jerry claimed over ₦6.44 billion was deducted from local government funds to pay legal fees—yet the lawyers allegedly received nothing. However, a meticulous fact-check reveals glaring mathematical errors, unsubstantiated figures, and a complete absence of verifiable evidence.

Jerry’s breakdown stated that ₦30 million was deducted monthly from each of the 23 local governments for six months, totaling ₦4.14 billion. He then claimed an additional ₦100 million per local government for two appeal months, adding ₦2.3 billion—for a combined ₦6.44 billion. But basic arithmetic exposes the flaw: ₦100 million × 23 local governments × 2 months = ₦4.6 billion, not ₦2.3 billion. When corrected and added to the earlier ₦4.14 billion, the actual total becomes ₦8.74 billion—nowhere near Jerry’s figure. This fundamental miscalculation alone undermines the entire financial narrative.

Beyond the numbers, no official document, government circular, or statement from the Bureau for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs confirms that such deductions ever occurred. No affected lawyer has come forward publicly with receipts, payment demands, or official correspondence to support the claim of non-payment. The assertion that one Senior Advocate, Barr. Mohammed Ndarani, received ₦2.55 billion while others got nothing also lacks any paper trail or named source.

The rebuttal, authored by Akawe Manasseh—an ardent supporter of Governor Alia’s administration—emphasizes responsible public discourse. “You cannot give what you do not have,” it quotes, urging citizens to verify facts before amplifying potentially damaging allegations. It notes that any dispute over fee sharing would be an internal matter among legal practitioners, not evidence of gubernatorial fraud. Accusing a sitting governor of criminal deceit without concrete proof, the post argues, is both misleading and professionally irresponsible.

Until verifiable information emerges from competent authorities—such as the Bureau for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs or the Office of the Accountant General—these claims remain speculative hearsay. Social media may amplify voices, but it cannot replace evidence. In the absence of documentation, the allegations against Governor Alia should be treated with utmost caution and skepticism.

This incident highlights a broader challenge in Nigeria’s digital age: the rapid spread of unverified information that can tarnish reputations and erode public trust. While accountability in governance is crucial, so is accuracy in criticism. As Benue navigates its political future, let facts—not fiction—lead the conversation.